Thursday, July 20, 2017 11:53:26 AM
I see that I have hit a sore spot when I talk about Industrial Nanotech's horrible reputation. I am not sure where you claim I can make it worse. Is it at the Better Business Bureau where INTK already enjoys an F rating, which is the lowest possible rating? Is it at OSHA, where INTK is illegally marketing a product as "OSHA Safe Touch" (it is illegal to market a product using the OSHA name)? Is it at the FTC or at the SEC, where INTK already has multiple complaints? Is it at Bain and Company, where INTK falsely represented that they had a partnership? Is it at INSULO CORP that was scammed for $20,000? Is it at Florida Attorney General's consumer fraud division? Is it the United States government programs that INTK imagines and represents that they have participated with?
As for the multiple RED FLAGS that I mentioned, which one would you like me to elaborate on?
As far as me selling my technical products to US Government agencies and laboratories, I see that you are unduly surprised. In the real world there is nothing unusual about this. Unlike Industrial Nanotech, other companies find no need to make up stories about their sales.
Branded Legacy, Inc. Unveils Collaboration with Celebrity Tattoo Artist Kat Tat for New Tattoo Aftercare Product • BLEG • May 22, 2024 8:30 AM
"Defo's Morning Briefing" Set to Debut for "GreenliteTV" • GRNL • May 21, 2024 2:28 PM
North Bay Resources Announces 50/50 JV at Fran Gold Project, British Columbia; Initiates NI 43-101 Resources Estimate and Bulk Sample • NBRI • May 21, 2024 9:07 AM
Greenlite Ventures Inks Deal to Acquire No Limit Technology • GRNL • May 17, 2024 3:00 PM
Music Licensing, Inc. (OTC: SONG) Subsidiary Pro Music Rights Secures Final Judgment of $114,081.30 USD, Demonstrating Strength of Licensing Agreements • SONGD • May 17, 2024 11:00 AM
VPR Brands (VPRB) Reports First Quarter 2024 Financial Results • VPRB • May 17, 2024 8:04 AM