DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[frogdreaming]

bag8ger, I rest my case.

Fraud: A deception deliberately practiced in order to secure unfair or unlawful gain.

There is no deliberate deception. No promises are made and the practice of selling shares for all operating costs and salaries is mentioned in every filing.

There is nothing 'unlawful' about the gain. It is totally legal and above board.

The only fraud taking place in this arena is that practiced by the pumpers as they lie and misrepresent the company to the nvestment community. All of the hype comes from them, not the company.

And your conclusion that I have no interest in the science is ludicrous.

It is a well established conclusion based on your pathological avoidance of every scientific tenet presented here. The principles of logic are studiously ignored and you hold fast to concepts long after the scientific world has dealt with them.

You may well have plunked down your money six years ago, you may well have been enamored by the promises made by a scientist, but you have never tried to understand the science.

I'll bet I was reading articles on genomics before you were out of high school.

I'll bet you weren't. 'Genomics' did not appear until the 80's and didn't take off until the 90's. The major tools and methods related to genomics are bioinformatics, genetic analysis, measurement of gene expression, and determination of gene function. None of these even existed in the 60's when I got out of high school. Try again. Perhaps you meant 'genetics', in which case you may be correct, but you have just cast significant aspersions on your claims regarding scientific understanding.

regards,
frog