InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 5005
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/14/2009

Re: ccraider post# 22329

Sunday, 07/16/2017 10:22:57 AM

Sunday, July 16, 2017 10:22:57 AM

Post# of 23258
What is odd is ALL the lawyers filed to quit. PTSC/TPL has used other lawyers for the court room stuff and changed them (remember Otteson from the HTC case) but PTSC has used the Hoge law from for a long time I believe and TPL has used Silicone Valley Group for a long time I think. To have all their lawyers filed to withdraw at one time is interesting. Maybe consolidating to save money?

I suspect that if the case goes on PTSC/TPL wants a different lawyer arguing their case in the court room. I listened to the appeal oral arguments and the lawyer for PTSC/TPL from NELSON BUMGARDNER P.C. was TERRIBLE!! He simply could not articulate the 336 patents inventiveness is GENERATING the frequency used to clock the CPU. He tried to squeak it in at the end somebody probably frantically texted him to say it. He stumbled through the presentation. SO it may not be terrible that another lawyer would argue. There are oral arguments scheduled for the motion for summary judgment that the defendants will probably file (due August 1). Then PTSC/TPL responds to that then defendants respond to PTSC/TPLs response then there is supposed to be a hearing on Sept.5th in front of the judge.

All above in my opinion.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CPMV News