Sunday, July 16, 2017 10:22:57 AM
I suspect that if the case goes on PTSC/TPL wants a different lawyer arguing their case in the court room. I listened to the appeal oral arguments and the lawyer for PTSC/TPL from NELSON BUMGARDNER P.C. was TERRIBLE!! He simply could not articulate the 336 patents inventiveness is GENERATING the frequency used to clock the CPU. He tried to squeak it in at the end somebody probably frantically texted him to say it. He stumbled through the presentation. SO it may not be terrible that another lawyer would argue. There are oral arguments scheduled for the motion for summary judgment that the defendants will probably file (due August 1). Then PTSC/TPL responds to that then defendants respond to PTSC/TPLs response then there is supposed to be a hearing on Sept.5th in front of the judge.
All above in my opinion.
Recent CPMV News
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/02/2023 05:17:22 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/03/2023 06:44:38 PM
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM