Friday, July 14, 2017 11:50:11 PM
If a public company is not an SEC registrant, then you should consider it fraudulent.
Should we consider it fraudulent to the extent that PGPM has produced financials from an accounting firm who put their name on paper and that they have many more clients than PGPM, are they aiding continuation of a perpetual fraud?
And anyone buying such shares are often supporting fraudulent activity.
Should we consider that all the share holders are supporting fraud buying stock in a "NOT SEC registered" public company?
Seems crimes have been committed by anyone holding shares here....aiding and abetting!
Is that your take???
Information above may be speculative, based on mis-information, contain inaccurate data, be entirely tongue-in-cheek, depending on how much liquor I consume, how litigious and degree of stupidity / gullibility exhibited by the poster/reader I respond to.
ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) Launchs IQ Nano Drone for Commercial Indoor Use • HALO • Oct 10, 2024 8:09 AM
CBD Life Sciences Inc. (CBDL) Targets Alibaba as the Next Retail Giant for Wholesale Expansion of Top-Selling CBD Products • CBDL • Oct 10, 2024 8:00 AM
Foremost Lithium Announces Option Agreement with Denison on 10 Uranium Projects Spanning over 330,000 Acres in the Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan • FAT • Oct 10, 2024 5:51 AM
Element79 Gold Corp. Reports Significant Progress in Community Relations and Development Efforts in Chachas, Peru • ELEM • Oct 9, 2024 10:30 AM
Unitronix Corp Launches Share Buyback Initiative • UTRX • Oct 9, 2024 9:10 AM
BASANITE INDUSTRIES, LLC RECEIVES U.S. PATENT FOR ITS BASAFLEX™ BASALT FIBER COMPOSITE REBAR AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING • BASA • Oct 9, 2024 7:30 AM