After reviewing a some literature I ran across the waste ratios and found that waste powder was consumed by support structures in both the laser process and EBM. However, in EBM the support structures did not need to be as robust as they were in laser, so the conclusion is there appears to be more waste in using laser additive processes, except in the Fraunhofer process. I had never seen the later before.
Here, a bike builder discusses working with EBM and DMLS generated parts and you see him remove the support structures from both. The DMLS structures clearly use more raw material and so there's more waste. From everything I've read so far, additive manufacturing involving a melt has similar needs for a robust support structure, but I found no video for removing supports from laser melted parts. Fraunhofer appears to need no supports in their process.
I can't quite accept that laser sintering generates as robust a part as electron beam melting or laser melting as they're not fully dense but it looks like Spencer Wright, the fellow in the video, is considering sintered parts.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.