Hangover Joe's Holding Corp. (fka HJOE)

[I-Glow]

How about providing proof of this nonsense:

"Several recent cases suggest the SEC is now recommending that issuers who want to make things right should accept revocation, and then get two years of audited filings in order and file a new Form 10. That has the advantage of relieving the company from the obligation to catch up with dozens of old financial reports"

Please provide any facts or DD to suggest this is true.

The problem was that HJOE didn't respond and tried to be slick and file a Form 15 to keep from being revoked.

The HJOE clowns are so incompetent that the first Form 15 was filed for the wrong company - that was hilarious.

But the nonsense you posted about the SEC is recommending the companies accept the revocation just isn't true.

If it was true why did HJOE try and file a Form 15 to avoid revocation?

IG