InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 10
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/23/2017

Re: None

Thursday, 07/06/2017 3:51:23 PM

Thursday, July 06, 2017 3:51:23 PM

Post# of 113390
I have a question about the LOM number of 32 years. To me this seems lower than it should be, as I remember a few years ago when they did the press releases about the resource content it always said something like resource continues at depth (or something like that). To me this implies that they only drilled core samples deep enough to complete the FS, there this is still additional resources that will keep the mind going longer than 32 years. Does this make sense?
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NB News