InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 164
Posts 22412
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 01/21/2006

Re: bessie post# 7001

Wednesday, 09/13/2006 12:19:07 AM

Wednesday, September 13, 2006 12:19:07 AM

Post# of 33129
The following is a good message from the kid. He's no longer the moderator nor is it a 'cult' over there. We're just some patient longs who like to support our stock amid friends who like to think positively. Nothing wrong with that! I think it's healthier than compulsively and sadistically bashing a stock that's not even (currently) worth a half cent. Why does the anti-TNOG entity do that? No particular reason. Just because. That's the disingenuous reason the bashers will give you.

Isn't it funny how they gang up and attack an innocuous island of peaceful longs? A board they can't spam with their vitriol and incessant reruns must be very frustrating to them. Why can't they just leave us alone and ignore us? And why do they virulently attack 'the kid' in particular? Probably because they consider him to be the lynch pin of the longs. They figure if they can get him to sell, then it will trigger a general stampede to the exits. I don't know of any long on that board that is planning on selling at these lows. In fact, we're planning on buying more. Sorry, Charlies.
-----


There are 2 entirely different visions for the future of TNOG.

Vision #1) TNOG is a start-up Oil and Gas company that is actively
trying to become a viable business entity based upon a conservative
business model. Once they establish a positive stream of Revenue,
albeit slowly at first - there will be a "snowball effect" as
revenues are redirected into further drilling - and with Pete Maupin
calling the shots along with some good 'ole fashioned luck - TNOG
will defy gravity and rise to new and unprecedented heights.

Vision #2) TNOG is an outright scam. They have not, nor will they
ever produce anything. They exist solely to sell shares to the
unsuspecting and gullible who are willing to be parted from their
money.

Since we do not have a Clear Answer as to which of these totally
incompatible visions is the truer, it really comes down to WHAT WE
BELIEVE. Doesn't it?

I (and most of us here) believe the propensity of the available
information supports Vision #1, although that is not a guarantee,
what is guaranteed in life anyway?

Many others (particularly on Raging Bull) believe in Vision #2. They
offer as evidence past failures, spurious allegations of
purported "Insider Selling", and character assasinations of Kent
Jacobson, Pete Maupin, Clayton and Brandon (Novak) - along with
accusations that this board is dominated by what they term
as "Ostriches and Nazis".

Again, nobody KNOWS the answer. It really comes down to what we
BELIEVE.

Personally, I believe that I will buy more shares, but that is my
decision only. I am a big boy, I am willing to take the risk to back
up what I believe.

Yet the opposition cannot commit to sell more shares - because they
don't own any to sell anyway. Or perhaps they are selling shares
they don't really have? That is more likely IMO.

But that is also very illegal.

The only way the shorts can win is if they drive TNOG right into the
dirt. The only problem with that theory - is the potential
probability that Pete Maupin may actually get the ball rolling,
meaning actually bring in a Revenue Stream.

And if that happens - the brokerage houses and the marketmakers will
be in a profoundly untenable position. That means that they will
have to pay "out the nose" for their bad bets.

I will continue to believe in Vision #1 and buy more TNOG.

And will someone please repost this to Raging Bull and IHUB?

Hey, you jackasses out there...........

I have not been a Yahoo Board Moderator for 2 friggen weeks now.

So all you bashers can shut yer yaps as regards kid shelleen.

The TNOG LONGS Board is moderated by a fine group of LONGS, but not
by yours truly anymore.

So you low-life basher idiots in Internet-Land better find a new
target for your venomous terrorist campaign against a USA O&G start-
up company.

Once again, the Bashers have no clothes.

They show themselves for what they are: Non-shareholders with an
agenda, and a despicable one at that.

How can these people even look in a mirror? I don't know.

kid shelleen