InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 20
Posts 1722
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/17/2009

Re: kphone2004 post# 9541

Wednesday, 06/28/2017 10:30:32 PM

Wednesday, June 28, 2017 10:30:32 PM

Post# of 16622
I know you're under the impression that somehow there's a mysterious way how to value this business that is much different than every other business in the world, but that is just a myth on your part. Business valuation has been the same since the 1800's. It has not changed at all.

The Gates Foundation DOES NOT use nanologix products. A company that is a receiver of funding from the Gates Foundation has allegedly, according to Nanologix, entered into an agreement with Nanologix. An agreement which is vague at best. History has shown these past agreements the company has made has resulted in little to no revenue (i.e. EPA, Saudi Arabia, Battelle, Texas Medical Center, even a customer that committed to purchasing 7,000 test kits per month which didn't even purchase 1 per month).

I agree with you on one thing. The end of this year should be plenty of time needed to find a buyer for the international patents of the flatpack. When you realize the company is unable to sell it due to no interest OR that the amount is so small that it won't equal anything close to a half a penny per share, you'll see the value of this company first hand. Upon its own admission, the company has never had an offer to be purchased. I don't expect that to change whether it's an offer for the entire business or just the patents.