InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 646
Posts 40189
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 04/28/2013

Re: sharpei post# 68701

Wednesday, 06/28/2017 1:32:51 PM

Wednesday, June 28, 2017 1:32:51 PM

Post# of 83957
I dont they care about sneakers....as i said mr Scott Pruitt is cutting regulations and also its workforce.. 1200 jobs poof gone..


Check out the latest bag of fun...




EPA Head Met With CEO of Dow Before Rejecting Ban on Dow's Toxic Pesticide




Rhett Jones

Yesterday 10:34pm

Filed to: POISON

47.2K

13




Photo: Getty

Scott Pruitt seems like the kind of guy who would dunk his first born in toxic waste just to demonstrate that it would survive. Still, his decision to reject a ban on a popular pesticide that’s been shown to harm children’s brains was a little surprising. On Tuesday, we found out that a cozy relationship with the pesticide’s manufacturer may have influenced his thinking. 




What is this Toxic Chemical Scott Pruitt Wants to Keep in Your Food?

Throw aside your politics for a bit. Government scientists at the EPA concluded that a pesticide…

Read more

On March 29th, the EPA administratorrejected a petition from the Pesticide Action Network North America (PANNA) and the Natural Resources Defense Council to ban chlorpyrifos. The organophosphate pesticide has been in use since 1965 and in recent years, scientists have demonstratedrepeatedly that it has negative effects on the development of children’s brains.

ADVERTISEMENT

Scientists at the EPA concluded that even in tiny doses chlorpyrifos can interfere with the development of children’s brains and the levels in food were higher than they consider safe. Despite some interagency debate about conclusions by the chemical safety staff, a revised study still found that the pesticide should be banned. When Pruitt announced that he would deny the ban, he said, “By reversing the previous administration’s steps to ban one of the most widely used pesticides in the world, we are returning to using sound science in decision-making — rather than predetermined results.”

The EPA released Pruitt’s March meeting schedule earlier this month following multiple FOIA requests and the Associated Press noticed something interesting. Just 20 days prior to rejecting the ban, Pruitt met with Dow CEO Andrew Liveris. Dow manufactures chlorpyrifos and it also spent $13.6 million on lobbying in 2016. From the Associated Press report:

EPA spokeswoman Liz Bowman said Tuesday that Pruitt was “briefly introduced” to Liveris at the conference.

“They did not discuss chlorpyrifos,” Bowman said. “During the same trip he also met with the Canadian minister of natural resources, and CEOs and executives from other companies attending the trade show.” ...

Though his schedule for the intervening months has not yet been released, Bowman said Pruitt has had no other meetings with the Dow CEO. There was a larger group meeting that Pruitt attended which also included two other Dow executives, but she said that didn’t involve chlorpyrifos.

Let’s see what this Andrew Liveris looks like:




Photo: Getty

You can tell which one’s him because he’s the guy being handed the pen. Trump handed him that ceremonial pen after signing an executive order stating that for every new regulation created, two had to be eliminated. According to the AP, Dow also donated $1 million to Trump’sunderattended inauguration. 

ADVERTISEMENT

The next EPA review of chlorpyrifos is scheduled for October 2022. That’s a long time for this chemical to do its damage. But not everyone has resigned themselves to accepting Pruitt’s decision. On Tuesday, The American Academy of Pediatrics sent a letter to the EPA administrator requesting that he follow through with the pesticide ban. “There is a wealth of science demonstrating the detrimental effects of chlorpyrifos exposure to developing fetuses, infants, children, and pregnant women,” the group which represents 66,000 pediatricians and pediatric surgeons wrote. “The risk to infant and children’s health and development is unambiguous.”

Asked to respond, EPA spokeswoman Liz Bowman said, “Despite several years of study, EPA has concluded that the science addressing chlorpyrifos remains unresolved.” At a hearing on Tuesday, Senator Tom Udall pressed Pruitt to offer any peer-reviewed evidence that the pesticide is safe. That’s not really his style and he pivoted to saying that he based his decision on “interagency dialogue” with USDA. He could have just asked the scientists in his own agency, but he’s beenrapidly purging them from the ranks.

[Associated Press]

Scott Pruitt is a bad man




Top EPA Official 'Bullied' Scientist to Change Testimony About Dismissed Scientists




EPA Set to Eliminate Over 1,200 Employees By September




EPA Sacks Advisors Overseeing Scientific Integrity But It's Fine, Everything's Fine

Rhett Jonesrhett.jones@gizmodo.com@rhettjonez

Writer

  

by Taboola 

Sponsored Links 

.

Janet Jackson, The Truth Behind The ScenesRead on Hollywood Lifestyle

The Moment When This Pit Bull Realizes He’s Being Given Up Will Have You WeepingRead on Scribol

How a Chlorine 'Freak Accident' in a Pool Hospitalized Five Kids




Rae Paoletta

12 minutes ago

Filed to: WHAT

1.4K

?

Photo: Getty

You can finally add “swimming pools” to your running list of seemingly mundane-but-murderous-pastimes. At around 7pm EDT on Monday, local authorities in Tamparesponded to an emergency call involving five sick children at a local pool. As reported by ABC News and others, a “cloud of chlorine gas” appeared in the Calypso Pool hours after a thunderstorm had caused one of the water pumps to spontaneously switch off. The children were rushed to the hospital after expressing stomach discomfort and nausea. Thankfully, it seems like no one was seriously injured.

How a cloud of chlorine suddenly appeared in an indoor pool is troubling to say the least. According to the Hillsborough County Fire Rescue, the pump that malfunctioned after the thunderstorm “pushed the chemical mix into the pool causing a small cloud of chlorine gas.”

Though representatives from Calypso Pooltold ABC News the incident was a “freak accident,” similar outbreaks have occurred before. In 2012, eight swimmers at a public pool in Topeka, Kansas were hospitalized after being hit in the face—and elsewhere—by a cloud of chlorine. Possibly the most severe case was in 2014, when a small chlorine gas cloud appeared at a water park in Michigan. The incident caused roughly 50 people to receive treatment after they reported breathing problems.

In this latest case, a malfunction with the equipment does indeed appear to have been responsible for the chlorine cloud.

“What’s happening here is they’re using some type of hypochloride or another chemical as a disinfectant,” Frankie Wood-Black, principal of Sophic Pursuits, Inc. and an instructor at Northern Oklahoma College, told Gizmodo. “Looking at this story, [it] appears they’ve had a malfunction in their disinfecting equipment and that it actually caused a buildup of whatever chemical they were using. Because of that, they pushed a slug.” Basically, once the pump restarted, it appears to have pushed out a horrible nightmare cloud of toxic gas.

While chlorine clouds in public pools receive the most media attention, Wood-Black explained that incidents like this happen in people’s home pools fairly frequently.

“There are a lot of residential poisonings that occur because somebody has mixed bleach improperly with another chemical,” she said. “That gas that you get when you mix bleach improperly is chlorine gas. Unforunately it is not all that uncommon, because people don’t understand what they’re mixing.”

So how can a responsible pool ownerprevent chlorine clouds from bubbling up?

“Read and follow the label,” Wood-Black said.
StorePermissionsPrivacyTerms of UseAdvertisingJobsRSS©2017 Gizmodo Media Group


Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.