Wednesday, June 28, 2017 3:29:00 AM
The whole notion of "control via a smartphone ap" is a non-starter, since most broadcasters prefer to have their mission-critical technical equipment connected to a secure, hardwired network. Most, if not all of the equipment manufactured by the companies I mentioned in my post of last month is controlled in that manner.
If "smartphone control" is such a frigging good idea, why haven't other manufacturers of professional broadcast equipment already offered it on their mission-critical products? If "smartphone control" of SyncPal is real and such a big deal, why hasn't Scamlatus plastered screenshots of the SyncPal smartphone ap all over their website? The only reason Scamlatus is touting smartphone control is that, in the minds of the clueless d-bags who write their PR, smartphone control is cool, hip, and a key feature of their yet-to-be-defined "Immersive Broadcast Solution."
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM