QS Energy Inc (QSEP)

[mr_sano]

More peer review butt whipping. Ouch!

"In an archival journal paper in the field of energy and fuels, the author(s) should give sufficient details, so that a competent worker could repeat the experiments. If the method is new and unpublished, all of the needed details must be provided, but if the method has been previously published in a standard journal, then the literature reference should be given. Questions such as “why”, “how”, and “how much” should be precisely answered by the author(s) and not left for the reader to puzzle over. The application of a strong electric field might reduce the fuel viscosity and lead to finer atomization, but there is no room that finer atomization would improve combustion efficiency by 20%. The authors do not present any credible evidence in the paper to support their claims, and these claims and conclusions violate the first law of thermodynamics."