Monday, June 26, 2017 1:28:00 PM
Given that it is clearly mentioned in the prospectuses for LB UK IV TRuPS and LB UK V TRuPS that they are JUNIOR in priority to (ie., rank lower in priority to) LBHI's TRuPS (ie., the LBHI US TruPS which are the CTs issued in the US - LEHKQ, LEHLQ, LHHMQ & LEHNQ), how can LBHI legally justify not paying the CTs IF the UK Courts 'enforce' the UK TruPS to be paid thru the "Trust Partnership Liquidation' process that the Trustee/'Liquidation Trustee' appointed by the UK courts for this matter?
Would a 'Full redemption' payment for the UK TruPS by the UK Court appointed "Liquidation Advisor/Trustee) make our case stronger to demand a similar action by JPMC (US Guarantee Trustee for CTs)?
I appreciate very much your expert opinion...
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM