![](https://investorshub.advfn.com/uicon/564105.png?cb=1547105359)
Monday, June 26, 2017 9:34:36 AM
I think the only real driving force behind split ratio selection is to ensure the end PPS is sufficient for the uplisting with a bit of a buffer to cover any price fluctuations. I don't have any specific preference for a higher or lower ratio because the math will still work out the same; I will own a certain percentage of the market cap value.
The game here will be minimizing dilution, which cuts our percentages down. I wish I could personally do something about that. I do wonder if they could have priced the offering a couple cents higher; two cents more per share would mean 18% less dilution to raise the same funds, and we were around .16 or so when the announcement came out. It could have possibly served to stabilize the PPS around .13 instead of around .11 for the near term. But then again, I also did take advantage of this buy opportunity; I got more at .1122 so I can't complain. And management may have needed to pick a price which assures they successfully raise the money they need. Must have been yet another tough decision!
Greenlite Ventures Completes Agreement with No Limit Technology • GRNL • Jul 19, 2024 10:00 AM
VAYK Expects Revenue from First Airbnb Property Starting from August • VAYK • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Acquires Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Sierra County, California, with Assays up to 4.8 oz. Au per Ton • NBRI • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Nightfood Holdings Signs Letter of Intent for All-Stock Acquisition of CarryOutSupplies.com • NGTF • Jul 17, 2024 1:00 PM
Kona Gold Beverages Reaches Out to Largest Debt Holder for Debt Purchase Negotiation • KGKG • Jul 17, 2024 9:00 AM
Avant Technologies Welcomes Back Former CEO with Eye Toward Future Growth and Expansion • AVAI • Jul 17, 2024 8:00 AM