Monday, June 26, 2017 8:48:05 AM
So if Nanologix attracted the interest of some large corporation and licensed the FlatPack, they could've gotten a royalty of perhaps a penny per pack rather than ten dollars for selling a ten-pack of plates. The would sell no more plates, and be out of business. And then what would we get, some dividend check of essentially nothing sent out by some successor trustee?
Where do you get the idea that Nanologix could have attracted some large corporation and that the corporation would've been happy to have packaging that would result in less sales due to two-year shelf life versus three months?
EI
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM