InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 73
Posts 4045
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/29/2008

Re: Bentobox post# 320665

Saturday, 06/24/2017 3:52:43 PM

Saturday, June 24, 2017 3:52:43 PM

Post# of 326338
Bento,

I merely shared my thoughts. I could prove wrong in the end. However...I DO NOT believe I am wrong.

Some entity expended the time consuming effort and paid the pricey fee to remove the DTC Chill. Whether that entity was YA or Neom, one of them acted to remove the chill. This single act, in and of itself, represents a key indicator. Nobody would pay significant money to lose that money; nor would anyone pay such money to benefit only slightly. The intent would have been to yield a significant profit.

Rocket had also identified the patents were reassigned back to Neom. Why? Yes indeed...why? wink

I have my reasons for commenting on a r/m and r/s and believe them to be spot on. However, I also have specific reasons for not posting them. I merely point to Q3 or Q4 as the timing for news.

All of the above...strictly my opinion.

Best,
Be Confident