Avid Bioservices Inc (CDMO)

[sulaco]

Wild, cancer is a survival mechanism


Yes it is. It's a messenger. It tells the person who has it,

"You can't go on this way."

"You can't go on living like this."

Early detection, though a wonderful concept, and one I'm fully behind (especially for PPHM's PS vesicular exosome blood test), does have its limitations.

Witness mammograms. A bad bill of goods sold to a gullible public. For "early" detection. There's only one problem. They do more harm than good.

Switzerland got rid of them a few years ago. Other countries will ultimately bag this "early detection" test.

Check it:

By GINA KOLATA NYT
FEBRUARY 11, 2014

One of the largest and most meticulous studies of mammography ever done, involving 90,000 women and lasting a quarter-century, has added powerful new doubts about the value of the screening test for women of any age.

It found that the death rates from breast cancer and from all causes were the same in women who got mammograms and those who did not. And the screening had harms: One in five cancers found with mammography and treated was not a threat to the woman’s health and did not need treatment such as chemotherapy, surgery or radiation.

The study, published Tuesday in The British Medical Journal, is one of the few rigorous evaluations of mammograms conducted in the modern era of more effective breast cancer treatments.

So there you have it. Early detection makes NO DIFFERENCE.

So am I against early detection? Certainly not. In fact, it may indeed saves many lives, but not necessarily.

PPHM's PS vesicular exosome blood test looks great, and may make us all very wealthy.

But the fact remains that early detection does not necessarily mean a better chance at cure. Huh?

We're living in a cancer sewer bath with our modern lifestyles, and THAT has to change if a cure is really what we're after.

Cancer is a lifestyle disease. And an early detection blood test, might prompt a person to change their lifestyle, but NOT necessarily. 400 lb. morbidly obese people eat through their gastric bypass operations every day. They initially lose 200+ pounds, which is great, and then proceed to blow through their surgical treatment and gain it all back.

Why? Because lifestyle habits are not to be underestimated.

Striking at the root of cancer seems great when that root is small. But until fundamental changes in modern life are made (which I'm not sure are on the horizon), cancer is here to stay, my man.

In fact, early diagnostics may lead to earlier treatments, with earlier deadly side effects of treatment.

If earlier diagnosis leads to earlier CHEMO expect MORE people to die from cancer.

I'm sure you agree that most cancer patients in the U.S. die from chemotherapy, not their original cancer.

Go PPHM with their PS vesicular exosome blood test. I'm all for it. But if you think that's a big blow to cancer mortality in this country and around the world, I've got a sofa, a television, an IPAD, a smartphone, and a big box of Twinkies to admit to the court as evidence.

Best,

Joe Six Pack (which lasts in my fridge for 6 months) LOL