InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 16
Posts 3489
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/10/2009

Re: None

Thursday, 06/22/2017 12:31:28 PM

Thursday, June 22, 2017 12:31:28 PM

Post# of 52074
I was very interested in finding out what separates AS from being considered a method to sterilize instruments.
If you can eradicate all forms of biological existence, including, but not limited to, yeast, fungi, molds, bacteria and viruses, then why can't they submit such a claim to EPA and FDA?

Shannon said that it was almost completely sterile. Then he retracted and said it was 100% Pathogen free.

Any definition of Sterile is defined as free of all bacteria and other living organisms.

ster·i·li·za·tion
?ster?l?'zaSH(?)n,?ster??li'zaSH(?)n/
noun
1.
the process of making something free from bacteria or other living microorganisms.
"disinfection and sterilization of surgical equipment"

Clearly Shannon is aware of this.
I can only assume that the testing to prove this would require extra time and effort, which would slow down the efforts towards a lower hanging fruit.

Additionally, a standard, small Autoclave is a lot cheaper than an AS unit. But hospitals have to autoclave using very large walk in units at much higher prices.

If necessary, they could add a UV light during the normalization process to finalize the sterilization process.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.