yes.
1) Because the I-Co's will show reasons Why they aren't responsible, as well as showing Hardship, throw the treble damages out the window, fuut. Hard to prove? All I-Co's will find reasons (judges probably heard them before,) why they had to do those things, a couple might be legitimate, as Business, like anything else in life, is a maize of misunderstandings, and innocent misjudgments, (I'm sure Vois would have a few of those to toss around too)!
2) Then, Vois might choose to accept a deal where royalty Payments have to be made-up until the "Settlement," or deal is concluded! Then to compensate for any damages, vois might demand each I-Co' that is rendered liable, to add maybe 10-25 percent ABOVE the regular Royalty payments for a period of years, breaking-down the damages into dollars, then spreading a certain percentage around until the damages are fulfilled, however long that might be?...or demand instead an interminable contract (Lifetime,) with each I-Co' paying royalties at 5-15 percent above the Customary amounts being paid quarterly!
3) Then there is a possibility that Gers accept payment from all the profits, from all sources, including the corn to Ethanol production itself, the I-Co's receive for a period of time until the debt is fulfilled!
4) Just to avoid the HUGE cash settlement, Gers might demand a small piece of the Co's themselves? Why not, the I-co's would be relieved of a large Dollar amount outlays?
4) In any case, the deal will be working on ways to break down the Dollar outlays that everyone can live with!
