InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 166
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/16/2014

Re: moneyjunkey post# 63343

Wednesday, 06/21/2017 1:38:45 PM

Wednesday, June 21, 2017 1:38:45 PM

Post# of 156701

Everything else they claim has no merit at all. No proof of anything but the lawsuit is real.



You're joking right? That's the funniest thing I have heard all day. There is absolutely merit!!!!!! Morgan defrauded the court by deliberately omitting a copy of the share agreement, among other things! HELLO!!! In by doing so he omitted the fact that he received 17,221,703 shares of Roadship Holdings in exchange for his 1125 shares of Click Evidence!!

THERE WAS NO EQUITY INVESTMENT TO WHERE MORGAN SHOULD BELIEVE THAT HE IS DUE 10% FOR A FINDERS FEE!!! The deal between Roadship and Click was an agreement to exchange shares, nothing more!

Why would Morgan get 17,221,703 of Roadship shares handed to him for FREE?? What I mean by this is that if Morgan was entitled to the 10% finders fee which equals somewhere around 90 million according to Morgan's suit plus the cash portion, then why was he part of the share exchange? Also can someone tell me why it would be reasonable for Morgan to think Dr. Jon needs to pay him a 10% finders fee on his own shares? That's laughable at best!!!
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent TTCM News