InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 253269
Next 10
Followers 839
Posts 120524
Boards Moderated 18
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: Jonathan Robinson post# 33778

Saturday, 09/09/2006 2:10:15 AM

Saturday, September 09, 2006 2:10:15 AM

Post# of 253269
Re: IN Byetta

>Any idea what the patent protection differences would be going BLA vs. 505b2? I assume there could be differences in defense as well as Hatch period. Although I assume the technology patents on formulation might have teeth in such a case.<

The patents themselves are not affected by whether IN Byetta is approved under 505b2 or under a regular NDA/BLA. If the patents were somehow knocked out, Hatch-Waxman exclusivity would come into play; exclusivity would run for five years if the drug were deemed a new molecular entity or three years if not. Your question is a good one because it might be hard for the companies to argue that IN Byetta was an NME if the approval was granted under 505b2.

For NSTK in particular, it would be a major embarrassment if the patents on IN Byetta did not hold up or if somebody managed to work around them. Dr. Quay has been boastful on many occasions regarding his company’s and his personal acumen in the realm of IP.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.