InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 18
Posts 933
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/14/2013

Re: alanthill post# 51286

Friday, 06/09/2017 1:29:43 PM

Friday, June 09, 2017 1:29:43 PM

Post# of 81999
Alan,

If there were even mildly positive analyst recommendations for companies with a competitive technology, then the lack of analyst support for SGLB would be of greater concern. Further, within the context of not having strong recommendations for more established companies in the AM chain, the lack of positive recommendations for a niche player like SGLB is of even less concern. Just take a look at the recommendations and lack therof for more basic companies within the chain such as manufacturers of metal capabale printers or metal powder suppliers. When one accepts that SGLB and its patented technology are going to add value to the manufacturing process when there is a shift from prototyping to large scale part production runs, and only then will it be realistic to look for analysts taking positions on SGLB. If serious production runs are accomplished without the benefit of IPQA, then a lack of analyst support would be more meaningful to me.

There is a tension between those who have become aware of the technology and look to the future to justify investment versus those who look to past performance as best indicated by revenues to justify investment. Each position has strengths and weaknesses. Ya pays yer money and takes yer chances or ya sit on the sideline and wait for the confirmation that will allow a decision about jumping in or continuing to sit pat.

patience and GLTA