InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 644
Posts 38176
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 03/29/2003

Re: None

Monday, 06/05/2017 7:34:40 PM

Monday, June 05, 2017 7:34:40 PM

Post# of 28442
$ UOIP $

ChanBond Cable Patent News:

The '622 patent allows high speed communication of data transfer by opening multiple RF channels. It can receive upto 10mb data and holds in eight channels and then combines it to produce upto 80mbps output. That is eight times normal throughput.

The '565 patent enables high speed communication of video signals via analog transmission. It dynamically creates multiple RF channels on demand and produces high speed video transmission.

After reading the documents it is clear cable companies are trying to discredit the validity of Chanbond patents by saying they are unpatentable because of "obviousness". However none of them were able to prove such claims and courts rejected their petition.

CISCO petition says that multi channel RF communication is somehow tied to prior art of single channel communication and for artisan with prior knowledge could open up another channel and call it multi-channel so it is so "obvious" and this art is not patentable. However multi channel communication involves a detector which detects which channel to use for transferring data by checking how much data each channel has and which channel is free to receive additional data for efficient and faster data transfer and also dynamically opening up new channel on demand to handle new data transfer request. This is not linked to any prior art hence courts rejected this petition.

RXP petition says that Chanbond combined prior art of Haugli and Grindahl to produce patent that is so "obvious" which any artisan with prior knowledge would have produced it but Chanbond lawyers able to prove that Grindahl and Haugli are two completely different methods of transferring data and can't be combined to produce better results. Courts rejected RXP petition as well as they unable to prove "obviousness".

When patents are granted it is checked for "obviousness" and "prior invention" so this was last shot for cable companies to defend their case and they are not able to do so. It all means big wins for UOIP/Chanbond.



Also:

Compliments of GS1

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.