InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 26
Posts 1346
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 03/06/2014

Re: rekcusdo post# 415157

Saturday, 06/03/2017 3:30:41 PM

Saturday, June 03, 2017 3:30:41 PM

Post# of 797406
Rek,

Gotta jump in on this one. You are incorrect here.

The government has infact balked on things that were explicit.

Remember they said Temporary? Well, nine-years is anything but temporary.

Remember they said Sound and Solvent? Well, i'd say not allowing them to pay back the loans at reasonable rates, and now taking all of their net worth quarter to quarter is anything but Sound and Solvent!

Sure you get the picture, they've not been honest at all. But dishonesty, according to some, is not against the law. Dishonesty is only if they get caught and held accountable. Here is were I further disagree about "judges" - they can be manipulated and can screw up. They are only human and can be influenced, sure its mostly against the law, but only if your caught and then found guilty by yet another brother judge. Not unlike the police, there are separate rules for them and for average joes. Sure, the may be written similarly, but enforced totally differently, which leads us all to the skeptical nature of the government and general "authority" as power corrupts, and absolute power, corrupts absolutely.

I'd think we are at the later stage.

So, yes, I would disagree with you and the intentions of government. They simply, can not be trusted.