Theory: We're all perplexed as to why the company continues to keep us in the dark regarding matters that typically would be relevant to shareholders.... whether it's the SCD conference coming up, or the 1.2m loan funding that happened 2 months ago, where we found out through a news editorial a week after it happened....
See if this makes sense, we all know there has been and possibly still are many conversion shares in the hands of the Chassman's et al, we also know of potential improprieties with conversion holders if it looks like the company was in kahoots to greatly benefit the holders of those conversion shares. OK, here we go, Chassman has been selling shares over the past 2 months (since the big run in July) and Pandey has intentionally kept the noise level low (actually non existent) until those shares are gone. Had the company hit the streets too early with PR's that would cause another run and sustained higher pps then Chassman could have profited by 500, possibly 1000% or more on the shares she bought less than a penny..... Does she or Blech really want that type of exposure or are they very satisfied with the 100-200% return they're realizing by selling at these levels?
We all knew after the last batch conversion shares were gone, which was just before approval was expected and right before the 1.2m loan was published (by the company).... We've all speculated the loans are a done deal, they most likely are, and as soon as Margie's shares are gone, at least the amount intended, then WHAM, the PR's hit!!!!!! Sounds like a win win for all involved, except for the ones not in of course!
"God Bless America our Troops and our Children"......... don't forget to, Let Freedom Ring!
AI
