InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,537.02
(
0.51%
)
US TECH 100
19,641.60
(
0.83%
)
Dow Jones
39,308.00
(
-0.06%
)
Brent Oil
86.74
(
-0.20%
)
Bitcoin
57,763.22
(
-3.99%
)
Post# of 447465
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

PegnVA

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 60
Posts 77495
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 04/13/2003

PegnVA

Member Level

Re: Alex G post# 45945

Thursday, 09/07/2006 8:42:31 PM

Thursday, September 07, 2006 8:42:31 PM

Post# of 447465
Thanks for posting - it's a well-crafted letter. I agree with the pedestrian's commentary on the letter..."Public figures can only sue for liable if there is actual malice, which is defined as a "reckless disregard for the truth". This letter seems intended to establish malice in case the piece is aired".

Clinton's att'y very carefully pointed out the errors by giving facts backed up with specific records, and he was very careful to point out the political leanings of the author, again with specifics.
As stated above, this letter "seems intended to establish malice"; I believe it does.


"If we talk about the economy, we'll lose"
-Bush44's top aide

"This campaign is not about issues"
-Rick Davis, Bush44's Campaign Manager


Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up