InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 253509
Next 10
Followers 839
Posts 120655
Boards Moderated 13
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: semi_infinite post# 211302

Monday, 05/29/2017 4:14:49 PM

Monday, May 29, 2017 4:14:49 PM

Post# of 253509

…your opinion with regards to EXAS vs that of Citron.

The Citron report is way off-base, IMO, with respect to Cologuard’s medical value. Citron has twisted the stats by citing “what if” figures in the make-believe world where everybody got screened for colorectal cancer. This is patently silly because the whole point of Cologuard is that many people won’t undergo routine colonoscopies.

Citron’s write-up is better with respect to EXAS’s business metrics, which are undeniably challenging. The company acknowledges it probably won’t be profitable during the next five years, but Citron extrapolates that out to infinity and asserts that superior blood-based (“liquid biopsy”) tests will be available before EXAS has a chance to turn profitable. In so doing, Citron is grossly underestimating the difficulty of creating a blood-based test that surpasses or even matches Cologuard on detection of cancer and precancerous lesions.

Disclosure: No position in the stock; I consider the valuation somewhat inflated.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.