Sunday, May 28, 2017 12:40:16 PM
NOW...LETS LAY OUT THE CASE
TWO PARTS
FIRST....FIRST SUIT.....BASED ON THE CONTRACT BETWEEN TAUB & ARYC
SECOND.....DAMAGES
WITH THAT UNDER STANDING
THOUGHT....THE COURT RULED THAT TAUB HAD NO BASIS FOR THE FIRST SUIT
SINCE TAUB HAD NO VALID CONTRACT WITH ARYC
AMEMDEN COMPLIANT......I'M NOT UP TO SPEED
YOUR THOUGHTS
TIA
TOM
Branded Legacy Secures Exclusive Extraction Partnership with One of the World's Largest Kava Distributors and Producers • BLEG • May 30, 2024 8:30 AM
ECGI Holdings, Inc. Announces $2 Million Debt-to-Equity Conversion • ECGI • May 30, 2024 8:30 AM
North Bay Resources Reports Assays up to >25% Mg, 0.1% Ni, 0.1% Cu, 0.01% Co, 0.3 ppm Pt at Tulameen Platinum Project, British Columbia • NBRI • May 29, 2024 9:03 AM
One World Products, Inc. Issues Shareholder Update • OWPC • May 29, 2024 8:20 AM
Green Leaf Innovations, Inc. Engages Olayinka Oyebola & Co for Two-Year Audit • GRLF • May 28, 2024 8:30 AM
HealthLynked Introduces AI-Powered Chat Function to Enhance Healthcare Accessibility • HLYK • May 28, 2024 8:00 AM