Firstly I think it's disrespectful to call a person of Professor Simpsons stature by a diminutive nickname.
Secondly it's very possible that clinical studies take more than two years and with the level of industrial theft in the world that early results might not be published until the full process is over.
And until that process is over how would you have something to patent?
Third, being listed as an inventor of the mellingen cells doesn't reduce Professor Simpsons integrity.
Fourth, you provide no proof that the eminent doctors and clinics involved with pcmb are mercenary just because they work for pcmb as consultants. There is nothing to say they would sell their names if they didn't think the company had integrity and a medical breakthrough which could prolong and improve people's lives.
Fifth, if I was offered 50,000 a year to consult on something I thought was worthless and I was recently given the golden standard by my colleagues as dr van Hoff was recently I would not associate myself with something which didn't seem hopeful and medically valid.
Sixth, not all people in the world do things just for money. Not everyone is misanthropic thank goodness. The time of eminent medical professors and researchers is limited and valuable and they don't waste it. Could you be confusing them with the sort of people who would do and say anything to impact pps to profit from fearful sales perhaps?
Seventh, the pre clinical studies of pcmb for cancer were very successful using less sensitive measuring equipment. They are a basis for hope.
Eighth. Yes, the technology wasn't picked up by anyone for many years. Neither were thorium molten salt reactors but now Bill Gates has invested in them and the Chinese have 50,000 scientists working on them.
Given the careers and reputations of people like Professir Simpson and their incredible work in discovering mellingen cells I believe they deserve more trust and respect and their integrity should not be questioned without facts.
Again. Do you have any facts she is the sort of person that would sell her name to pcmb if she believed they were just a scam? Do you have any facts to show that pcmb only pay their consultants for endorsement rather than for advice and consultation and clinical study of cell in a box?
Do you have any facts?
