InvestorsHub Logo

nez

Followers 17
Posts 1789
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/19/2006

nez

Re: dmondial post# 17967

Thursday, 09/07/2006 2:37:04 PM

Thursday, September 07, 2006 2:37:04 PM

Post# of 84181
Again this is from a person with limited experience who is learning. I was under the impression that the new exchange otcq, is different from the "pinks" in that to be listed on the otcq, a company must be more open about its finacial health. I was also under the impression, which could very well be wrong, the effort was the beginning of a process to weeding out companies which have a higher level of ligitimacy from those which may be nothing more than a shell. As such, these companies must be willing to submit themselves to examination at higher levels of scrutiny, regulatory requirements and accountability while also being more accessable for purposes of simple D&D. This, to me, would indicate companies like that would be more serious about building a successful buisness and are in the "birthing stage" so to speak. As I said, I may be completely off the mark about this and if I am I hope someone will clairify my understanding. It would be greatly apprieciated.
GLTA,
Nez
(no spell check, sorry)


Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.
Benjamin Franklin