InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 173
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/20/2016

Re: Money $hot post# 1866

Thursday, 05/18/2017 1:51:48 PM

Thursday, May 18, 2017 1:51:48 PM

Post# of 16698
I agree with AMG that strategically it would have been better, from a risk diversification perspective, to have NaNose in the BTH portfolio. But it became clear (to me) that the technology faced challenges through the monthly report updates. There may have been a workable solution for a company with deep pockets. But if you have a 2 year run rate, you have to think differently.

I don't know anything about Owelstone apart from the fact they are competition from other's posts on this board. Do you they rely on NaNose or FAIMS technology?

JB