Prism Technologies Group Inc fka PRZM

[Alvato]

Yes. Sprint will use the going concern language as a basis for arguing why they should not be required to satisfy the judgment now. The idea being if Sprint is successful with its Supreme Court petition Prism might not have the resources to repay the $30M. My reading of the relevant statute though is that the district court does not have the authority to delay Sprint's payment. Of course, Sprint (and the district court) know Sprint has no chance of having cert granted in any case. Sprint merely wants to delay till the T-Mobile case is decided. That won't help either though regardless of what happens and regardless of when it happens.