InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 375
Posts 16982
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 03/07/2014

Re: BoilerRoom post# 60010

Monday, 05/15/2017 10:57:05 AM

Monday, May 15, 2017 10:57:05 AM

Post# of 106837
Quote, "USRM Have a feeling RMAT got denied "

I agree, if "it" even ever was??

1) To me, it was really only discussed in the CEO "blog", not a mention in the SEC filed 10-Q if I remember correctly ? Which was "odd" to me, and a typical USRM red flag IMO. Will do a word search later, and check that out.

2) It's been vague since day one, using the "blog" method (typical for this penny play) versus actual PR or SEC filing, etc. ALSO, MOST OTHER COMPANIES ONLY ANNOUNCE OR "PR" SOMETHING AFTER IT ACTUALLY HAPPENS !! NOT "we hope/maybe/think/might/possibly could" be getting "RMAT" a blah, blah or whatever.

NOTICE THE COMPANIES WHO ALREADY GOT RMAT JUST RECENTLY, they didn't peddle a bunch of pre-hype and "WE'RE WORKING CLOSELY WITH THE FDA" and we did some sort of "REACTIVATION" a blah, blah bull crap to me. IF YOU WERE GONNA GET "RMAT", then why the hell not just put out the REAL PR, THE DAY THE FDA ACTUALLY GRANTED IT? Why in typical fashion, attempt to PUMP YOUR STOCK via dangling the ole, "WE'RE TALKING TO THE FDA" and "WE THINK WE COULD GET RMAT" blah, blah, blah same old tactic to me.

PR ONLY AN ACTUAL "MATERIAL EVENT" WHEN IT'S REAL, that's what real companies do IMO, not penny-ville dangle the carrot bull crap, in the middle of a huge pump and dump as far as I'm concerned.

3) REMEMBER, UNDER "SAFE HARBOR" and "FORWARD LOOKING" blah, blah, blah they, USRM and CEO Tomas OWE NO UPDATE, NO EXPLANATION if they DO NOT GET RMAT APPROVAL. IMO, It will simply vanish like a fart in a Texas wind storm....just like so, so, so, so, so many of their vast, past, oh so "great sounding" ole "bloggy" or "PR" ole "claims", NEVER TO BE HEARD ABOUT AGAIN in so, so many past cases.

I've got a list of past "PR"" or even old and vanished "blogs" (Remember stemcellceo who USED TO, PAST TENSE host all of Tomas' blogs for him? I do, and I have them all)...I have a list or link to "PR" pages thick, that never came true, never happened and then NEVER WERE HEARD ABOUT OR MENTIONED AGAIN, LOL !!

Here's a golden oldie replay from the "HOT SOUNDING PR" file, NEVER HEARD ABOUT AGAIN, just as a few examples. Heck, I'll post two, just for good times sake:

THE TATTOO BIZ, LOL !! A beauty if there ever was one to me:


https://www.accesswire.com/viewarticle.aspx?id=431645

Seen any "TATTOO" bull crap in any recent SEC FILINGS, LOL??? Neither have I?? Why, why would that be?

Or this one, another "agreement" or "non binding term" sheet blah-blah or whatever:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1388319/000114544311000058/d27799_ex99-1.htm

NOTICE THAT, they "entered into an agreement", LOL ! SOUND FAMILIAR? The ole "agreement" PR ! FANTASTIC RIGHT? Well, all except NOTHING EVER HAPPENED FROM IT. ZERO. ZIPPO. Never amounted to a hill of bad beans, but, but, but they had an "agreement" and put a big ole grand sounding "PR" and all, by golly !

http://www.bizjournals.com/southflorida/news/2011/04/26/bioheart-terminates-anc-bio-investment.html

https://vtdigger.org/2016/12/27/anc-bio-vermont-troubles-began-south-korea/

READ THAT SECOND ONE, it's better than a damn soap opera and crime novel combined IMO, and it's got "BIOHEART KOREA" smack in the middle of it all. FANTASTIC STUFF once again.

Ole Bioheart KOREA, oh what a great one that was. SOUNDED "big", it sounded so Yuuuge, but KAPUT. Never really was, never really happened. Just faded away into the sunset. A big ole nothing, like so many others.

THEY WILL NOT UPDATE ON "RMAT" IMO, if if if THEY DO NOT RECEIVE IT, as they are under SAFE HARBOR and thus "owe no update or obligation to inform" blah, blah, blah legal-eze cover your butt if it does not happen. Here is their SAFE HARBOR they peddle with any "FUTURE EVENT" bull crap they speak about:

"Forward-Looking Statements: Except for historical matters contained herein, statements made in this press release are forward-looking statements. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, words such as “may”, “will”, “to”, “plan”, “expect”, “believe”, “anticipate”, “intend”, “could”, “would”, “estimate”, or “continue”, or the negative other variations thereof or comparable terminology are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Also, forward-looking statements represent our management’s beliefs and assumptions only as of the date hereof. Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update these forward-looking statements publicly, or to update the reasons actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes available in the future."


Posts are only my amateur opinions, personal views and thoughts. They are not any type of investment advice. Do one's own due diligence.