Yes, theorizing. That's what we do on the OTC, right? I'm "sure" you hold at least "one" OTC stock where you are "theorizing" they will be able to pay down debt, stop increasing the AS, stop issuing toxic shares, & stop the pps free fall, right? It's OK with me that you are theorizing RVUE is done while a handful of us are theorizing it's not.
Quote:
Theorizing, theorizing theorizing while the ship is sinking! When the ship is sinking, the no 1 job is to escape and not to theorize!
THINK ABOUT IT
If the #1 job is to escape, why did Roche add ANOTHER $135k to the kitty 2 BUSINESS DAYS before he called in the notes when he could have "escaped"?
I am also theorizing almost the entire $15 million accumulated deficit came from Roche & affiliates. I'd post all the links but you don't have time to go thru them. Why would you?
Wouldn't the quickest "escape" be a chapter 7 filing where an administrator takes over and is tasked with selling the assets? Instead, Roche thru more $ in and there was no BK filing.
Why no schedule 13* filings for "going private"?
Are you aware the term "sole ownership" still applies when 1 person holds "most" of the shares along with only a "few others"?
Maybe your theory will be right. But respectfully, as long as a "Q" hasn't been added to the RVUE ticker and it continues to trade, I am theorizing your theory is premature and I will stick with my theory that it ain't over...
THINK ABOUT THAT
