InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 245
Posts 55847
Boards Moderated 12
Alias Born 04/12/2001

Re: None

Friday, 05/12/2017 2:15:11 PM

Friday, May 12, 2017 2:15:11 PM

Post# of 48180
Trump Lawyers Produce More Comically Bad Drafting

Morgan Lewis does great work, with a few exceptions.

By JOE PATRICE at 12:32 PM
http://abovethelaw.com/2017/05/trump-lawyers-produce-more-comically-bad-drafting/

A couple weeks back, the media worked itself into a tizzy when word got out that Trump’s lawyers from Jones Day told a federal judge that Trump’s detractors had “no right” to protest. As we pointed out, Trump’s probably right on that one, but the whole affair forced us to ask how a law firm — with edit after edit after edit — could file a motion with such obviously provocative language. A dry, staid “the law is well-settled that campaigns have the right to exclude dissenters from events” would have scored all the substantive points they needed without making the case a top news story.

Not to be outdone in the annals of piss-poor drafting, Morgan Lewis has penned a doozy of a letter ostensibly to clear Trump of mounting speculation that he’s Russia’s bargain basement Manchurian Candidate. This letter was ill-advised in any event, as it simultaneously manages to show Trump is defensive about his Russia ties and remind everyone that he’s never released his tax returns. But tax partners Sheri Dillon and William F. Nelson can’t control what their manic client demands. They could, however, avoid dumb lines like this:

With a few exceptions — detailed below your tax returns do not reflect (1) any income of any type from Russian sources….

And with a few exceptions, I’ve hooked up with every Victoria’s Secret model. What the hell were they thinking with this? Just say, “Your tax returns reflect a few, discrete deals involving Russian funds and we detail these below.” By framing the paragraph around “exceptions,” the whole story is going to be about the exceptions. These contortions just so they can string together the more definitive — yet false — phrase “any income of any type from Russian sources” just blew away any credibility behind the letter. By the way, Trump’s gotten over $100 million from Russian sources according to Morgan Lewis — that’s the amount that they clarify as not “income of any type.” It’s much more relevant to focus on the fact that all his money from Russia came in the course of two transactions that were both known to the public, but instead they’ve decided to focus on this myth that he’s not made any real money from Russia.

And the Internet reacted with the swiftness one would expect:
...
more
http://abovethelaw.com/2017/05/trump-lawyers-produce-more-comically-bad-drafting/

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.