![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Wednesday, May 10, 2017 2:33:57 PM
Hi observer21,
Yes, that is a true statement. The Federal Claims Court is required to follow law that is passed by the Appeals Court, considered a superior court to the Claims Court.
That being said, its fairly irrelevant since the AIG ruling is in relation to claims that were heard. In Sweeney's case, we are still dealing with discovery! Also, the AIG case is not identical to the GSE case, so there are many distinctions that can be drawn between the two.
FEATURED ELEMENT79 GOLD CORP PROVIDES UPDATE ON CHACHAS COMMUNITY CHARTER AND REVENUE GENERATION, M&A ACTIVITIES • Jul 30, 2024 8:00 AM
FEATURED Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Innovative Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Texas, USA • Jul 29, 2024 9:07 AM
Avant Technologies Opens Equity Line with GHS Investments as Company Explores Expansion into Additional Technologies • AVAI • Jul 30, 2024 8:00 AM
INDEXR AI Merges With Moon Equity Holdings Corp. (MONI), Creating a Leading-edge Technology Company • MONI • Jul 29, 2024 9:59 AM
BNCM AND DELEX UNVEIL POST-MERGER MANAGEMENT PLANS • BNCM • Jul 29, 2024 9:00 AM
Glidelogic Corp. Announces Revolutionary AI-Generated Content Copyright Protection Solution • GDLG • Jul 26, 2024 12:30 PM