NanoLogix Inc (NNLX)

[capitalismforever]

So it appears you are advocating insider trading based upon potential violations of tort law, with individuals contacting companies with whom NanoLogix is doing product development and research in order to gain confidential information; and you're basing your justification upon a book written sixty years ago?

Asking a company questions, regardless of what those questions are, is not the definition of insider trading. The information the company who is being asked the question is used to determine insider trading, not the questions that are asked of the company. It happens every day and is a normal process for collecting information.

You're stating it is fine to make those contacts?

Yes. It's absolutely, positively, fine to make those contacts. That's what research is.

Didn't NanoLogix state that they were fortunate those relationships with the three organizations were not destroyed?

Impossible for them to be destroyed from a non-affiliated individual asking them questions. It happens everyday. This isn't the first time Battelle, EPA, or Texas Medical Center has had someone call and ask a question.

How do you, personally, think most professional investment companies conduct research? I'm interested in your answer because research is the basic tenet to any professional investment operation and you seem completely surprised by that.

Wow, in my opinion you are really advocating illegal actions. Not cool at all. I advise against anyone pursuing that course.

Clearly you're confused on the legalities of asking a question. Fiduciary responsibility is not legally binding from the questioner. There is nothing illegal about it. This issue may be too big for you to understand.