"Irregardless, covering up a crime IS a crime or did that not ever occur to you? "
I believe you mean Obstruction of Justice. The term "Covering Up a Crime" doesn't actually mean anything in criminal law...and since you are referencing it as "a crime", how criminal law perceives it matters.
Obstruction of Justice is defined as interference with the orderly administration of law and justice, as by giving false information to or withholding evidence from a police officer or prosecutor or by harming a witness or juror.
So, I guess the question for you is...what police officer or prosecutor has been denied evidence by Obama?
If the answer above is "None", then there has been no obstruction of justice. After all...you can't cover up a crime unless you've actually been accused of a crime.
"I forgot, you're on the side of lawlessness. "
Technically, aren't YOU on the side of lawlessness? Isn't that your whole point? It doesn't matter what the law is as long as someone hangs?
Now, that all aside...back to the original post...
What exactly do you claim is not the truth?
Executive Privilege is not a crime.
True.
And the remedy of breaking Con Laws is not to take away ones retirement.
True.
It is also a little sad that you would actually wish something like that on someone.
True.
Which of these statements are you claiming isn't true? Lets not forget that your exact words were "This doesn't sound like truth to me."
