InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 239
Posts 6860
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/21/2017

Re: CJ10 post# 29956

Thursday, 05/04/2017 10:05:05 PM

Thursday, May 04, 2017 10:05:05 PM

Post# of 86216
Correction - 0nce all the questions are answered AND the correct submissions are in place. I noticed today during Bishop's facetime that he mentioned background checks for officers. No one seems to have picked up on that, but it appears that is a requirement or it would not have been mentioned.
As I have said before, there are questions and answers between OTC and AMLH (the new one), and the stop won't come down until all their requirements are met. We don't hear about all of those.
Not saying there is a problem, just stating that there is a lot more to it than AMLH submitting some information and all of us expecting the STOP to immediately drop.
It will happen, when OTC's due diligence is done. Meanwhile, we can be assured that AMLH is working with them to answer questions and submit required documentation.
I'm pleased that the company is making the effort to clean up the old company and initiate the new one. This is still faster than a proper IPO, so it's all good. This is my first reverse merger into an empty shell, but I've been in others where both were functioning companies, such as $PIP and $ALT.