InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 20
Posts 1134
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/11/2011

Re: Captart7 post# 24997

Monday, 05/01/2017 10:37:13 AM

Monday, May 01, 2017 10:37:13 AM

Post# of 46469

A quick test:
1) Were the treble damages at play mentioned?
2) Did the analysis include what past expenses were for IE: Operational or retiring of old debt, etc It's a quick way to distort future needs.
3) Were Tax losses accounted for in possible future returns?
4) What other details are they focusing on and which ones are being left out. Can show bias.
5) Did they try to 'educate' investors on acceptable returns then compare them to vehicles that the retail investor doesn't have access to? Risk/Reward is a personal thing, isn't it?
6) What was the vibe of news? Did it seem like it steered to a conclusion that was counter to the position the writer said they had?
7) How was the CEO able to get so much funding at the levels he did last year if massive dilution was forthcoming this year?


Hard to say... Time will tell.
I think most people can be emotional but hopefully can tell fake news when they see it.