InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5214
Posts 24091
Boards Moderated 7
Alias Born 09/20/2000

Re: janice shell post# 52791

Sunday, 04/30/2017 7:52:05 PM

Sunday, April 30, 2017 7:52:05 PM

Post# of 100568
Current BLDV Management & TJ Management Facts…

No matter how anyone choose to try to twist the facts, TJ Management was nothing more than a shareholder that was made to become a shareholder from a financing deal that was done by the previous CEO years ago (three CEOs ago) back in 2010.

TJ Management got in trouble with the SEC to not be allowed to deposit or trade their shares in any company that they owned shares in because of their wrongdoing with another company totally 100% separate from BLDV.

Imagine you buying shares in Microsoft (MSFT) or even doing a financing deal with MSFT years ago in 2010 to be only a shareholder and you go out and get a DUI now in 2017. Is it really even logical for Microsoft to be frowned upon and negatively judged because of you as a shareholder getting a DUI? Should it be deemed a negative for Microsoft that one of their shareholders got into some trouble with something totally unrelated to them? So, is it fair for BLDV to be frowned upon because of one of their shareholders getting into some trouble totally unrelated to them?

In case you didn’t know, the answer to all of those questions is… NO!

Sorry, no way this can be twisted to be a negative for BLDV.

With FINRA, I think it’s important to fully understand that there are no problems with BLDV. All FINRA wanted was for the new BLDV management to prove that they were not part of that transaction that happened way back in 2010 that made TJ Management a shareholder before considering to approve the reverse split.

The new BLDV management deemed it not necessary to deal with FINRA any further on providing such info because they simply deemed it necessary to be in the company’s best interest and the shareholder’s best interest to cancel the reverse split because of the liquidity that would be needed to make room for their future growth. If they would have done a reverse split, there would be a huge lack of liquidity which is very evident by how it is currently trading now which is also evident by looking at Level II during market hours.

BLDV has traded over 3.2 Billion shares over the past week or so. Only a guess, but I believe that a good portion of the 2.4 Billion shares at the DTC (Cede & Co.) that's in circulation as the ”True Float” or ”Actual Float” has been absorbed. Just think, if they would have done the reverse split, there would have been absolutely no liquidity at all for investors to buy many if any shares. They understand this which is why BLDV cancelled the reverse split as they deemed it not to be necessary to pursue.

v/r
Sterling


Exit Strategy & Etiquette Thoughts for a Stock
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=128822531