cliffvb- re: HSOA
cliff, the point is, when Stocklemon used the term "is history about to repeat itself", they were strongly suggesting that the insiders at the level of the CEO and CFO were selling shares again, and into a bogus earnings report. However, when you go to the actual S3, we can see that these supposed top insiders of HSOA are actually directors of companies which HSOA aquired. Also, the S3 is a registration, not an actual sale, however when they said is history about to repeat itself, they were suggesting that insiders at the level of the CEO and CFO had actually sold again.
As far as the bogus earnings reports, Stocklemon is suggesting that the revenues by HSOA booked can't be trusted because most of it was for work( called standby) that hadn't even been performed yet. Stocklemonaide explains that $3M of the $43M revenues booked this year was for Standby, and that Standby is common in the service industry. So, you see Cliff- Stocklemon is very deceptive. I mean $3M of $43M is hardly booking mainly bogus revenues!
In additon to all this, the lawyers for all the lawsuits can't even get a lead plaintiff!
Cliff- if you want to think Stocklemon has not been grossly deceptive in an attempt to get HSOA stock price down, that's up to you- I mean you don't have to buy, but to sit here and try to make it seem like Stocklemon tells it the way it is is rediculous. Wade
