InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 247
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/31/2017

Re: Magnum7419 post# 29563

Sunday, 04/23/2017 12:15:00 AM

Sunday, April 23, 2017 12:15:00 AM

Post# of 65773
The January numbers for Oregon that are repeatedly, repeatedly cited here.... in what month of the year do you believe the testing for that marijuana took place?


Remember this 8k?:

" Q: Has the Company experienced a reduction in revenues with the temporary testing rules in Oregon.
A: No, the temporary testing rules have not negatively impacted our revenues. These “temporary” rules have allowed for additional smaller producers and processors to participate in the market off-setting any reduction in testing volumes enacted by these rules."

We got two sentences to explain some complicated things that happened, but my understanding is that the old rules required that a test be done for each ten pounds, but the temp rules required tests for every 30 lbs. Please correct me if I'm wrong. Aren't these "additional producers" simply people who didn't have proper licenses, and therefore no product, during Q1.

I bet same-lab SGBY revenues will only be marginally higher in Q2.