Saturday, April 22, 2017 11:04:55 AM
Unless the original judgment against the former sub was obtained by fraud (lying to) the court, I don't see any way to have that judgment set aside at this point, but TTCM doesn't need to have the judgment set aside in order to prevail in this case.
The default against the former sub is useless (an "empty judgment"), unless the complainant is able to enforce against TTCM. TTCM was not a party to the original proceeding against the former sub, and therefore is entitled to raise every defence that the sub could have raised in the original proceeding. In effect, TTCM is entitled to a trial on the merits of the original claim if it is to be found responsible for the obligations of the former sub. TTCM is also entitled to various other defences specific to the cause of action that allows the complainant to try to enforce the default judgment against TTCM in the first place.
The mission to civilize continues. Disclaimer: All of my posted comments are opinion only and should not be construed or relied upon as fact or advice.
North Bay Resources Commences Operations at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California; Engages Sabean Group Management Consulting • NBRI • Sep 25, 2024 9:15 AM
CEO David B. Dorwart Anticipates a Bright Future at Good Gaming Inc. Through His Most Recent Shareholder Update • GMER • Sep 25, 2024 8:30 AM
Cannabix Technologies and Omega Laboratories Inc. Advance Marijuana Breathalyzer Technology - Dr. Bruce Goldberger to Present at Society of Forensic Toxicologists Conference • BLOZF • Sep 24, 2024 8:50 AM
Integrated Ventures, Inc Announces Strategic Partnership For GLP-1 (Semaglutide) Procurement Through MedWell USA, LLC. • INTV • Sep 24, 2024 8:45 AM
Avant Technologies Accelerates Creation of AI-Powered Platform to Revolutionize Patient Care • AVAI • Sep 24, 2024 8:00 AM
VHAI - Vocodia Partners with Leading Political Super PACs to Revolutionize Fundraising Efforts • VHAI • Sep 19, 2024 11:48 AM