KIK- Yes, and I did consider that
That's why I went back and checked out what I could to see how often Stocklemon was lying or being deceptive. I think deceptive is more accurate, and the answer turned out to be most of time they were. Let me tell you the two big things they said that were totally deceptive which is the crux of the selling on their last two reports. The first was about how HSOA owned 40% of ARH( which was deceptive to make a big deal about to begin with because ARH will only represent $5M of business in the Dec qtr) , and that someone at the company said this was true. after the report came out, ARH themselves came out and said Stocklemon was either lying or being deceptive, because HOM didn't own 40% of ARH-in fact they owned none of ARH.
The next big decpetion was a couple weeks ago, when the brunt of their report was about how the insiders looked like they were selling more shares(5M shares) right after blowout earnings. I then went to the filings, and checked it out. That was an outright lie/deception, because the S3 filing clearly stated that it was the president of a company HSOA aquired recently( fireline), and an insider of a company they aquired last year that were registering a total of 5M shares. Now, it is true they were registering to have the right to sell them, but they did not sell them, nor did they say anything about any plans to sell them anytime soon.
So KIK, you tell me, do I have a right to mistrust Stocklmeon? By the way, if I wanted to go into more of their decptive BS towards HSOA I could, but it would take too long. Anyway, if you want to know even more about their deceptive tactics, go to Stocklemonaide. com. Wade
AI
