Seafarer Exploration Corp (SFRX)

[jrf30]

"What evidence supports that statement? No, ballast, no olive jars, no cannons, no anchors, no artifacts, no treasure. If I'm wrong please correct me"

Consider yourself corrected.

Although it won't stop you from saying it again. Over and over again.

"Archaeologists for what? You don't even have a wreck site to work. "

See? Again you have a conclusion, even though you have not spoken to them, or been on the site.

"Well, all the above is only my opinion but what do I know. "

In my opinion, you know a LOT. A lot about treasure sites, a lot about diving. I even respect your knowledge. But ... what is or is not on THIS site? You do not know. have they found ballast stones? You say they have not. How do you know they have not? Ballast stones are not something to in and of themselves make a PR. WHy tell the world something like that if you haven't found the treasure yet (and they have not. they would announce that) But have they found ballast stones? Olive jars? YOU don't know. All I'm saying is that even with your knowledge in general, you have no idea what they have or have not found here, so please stop assuming. You may be right. But you may be wrong. Yet, with your vast knowledge, when you say with absolute authority that they have NOT found those items, I think you are overstepping.

Make sense?