InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 75
Posts 13313
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/10/2013

Re: loanranger post# 37409

Tuesday, 04/18/2017 7:43:22 PM

Tuesday, April 18, 2017 7:43:22 PM

Post# of 54031

Wish I could justify buying all of those pages. How does Miller address the fact that the time to demand a jury trial expired many moons ago?


The late filing was "inadvertent", per Miller! Inadvertent? Really? "The Holidays got in the way"! This doesn't seem to be a legitimate "excuse" and the Cowan attorneys definitely made the judge aware of it.

Apparently, the January 10 Demand for Jury Trial, since not timely filed, had no effect. (I am no expert, but after reading the various documents, it appears this is the case.) In late March Miller apparently sent an email to Herzog saying something to the effect "we are assuming this is a jury trial", which prompted Herzog to file a formal objection with the court, claiming Cowan had not beem apprised of any decision indicating the case would be heard by a jury. A formal Motion for Jury Trial had never been filed. After the objection, TAUG's attorney, Miller, filed a formal Motion for Jury Trial on March 31, a mere 87 days after it was originally due!

Once again, nice job by the TAUG's legal team! The "performance" might be better if the client had money to pay the legal bills!