Tuesday, April 18, 2017 7:43:22 PM
The late filing was "inadvertent", per Miller! Inadvertent? Really? "The Holidays got in the way"! This doesn't seem to be a legitimate "excuse" and the Cowan attorneys definitely made the judge aware of it.
Apparently, the January 10 Demand for Jury Trial, since not timely filed, had no effect. (I am no expert, but after reading the various documents, it appears this is the case.) In late March Miller apparently sent an email to Herzog saying something to the effect "we are assuming this is a jury trial", which prompted Herzog to file a formal objection with the court, claiming Cowan had not beem apprised of any decision indicating the case would be heard by a jury. A formal Motion for Jury Trial had never been filed. After the objection, TAUG's attorney, Miller, filed a formal Motion for Jury Trial on March 31, a mere 87 days after it was originally due!
Once again, nice job by the TAUG's legal team! The "performance" might be better if the client had money to pay the legal bills!
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM