InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 112685
Next 10
Followers 34
Posts 14217
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 03/27/2014

Re: lesgetrich post# 85046

Monday, 04/17/2017 6:40:05 AM

Monday, April 17, 2017 6:40:05 AM

Post# of 112685
$0 Revs from Intl VitaStik Sales FAILED TO PROTECT VITASTIK Trademark

You basically just agreed than The SHYSTER FAILED to protect the VitaStik trademark AND that MCIG got $0 for INTL sales of VitaStik branded product (not vitacig branded product)

How could MCIG possibly get money for INTL sales of VitaStik - when the SHYSTER solde VitaStik to Al Santos in February 2015 - and purposely didn't tell shareholders about it. Lied about it. Lied about updating shareholders during a CC.

MCIG-Paid media consultants were implying that tons of revenues were on their way.





Been saying that for well over a year now - RFLMAO

$0 Revenues for Rollie's MJ Cigarettes
$0 Revenues for 5 DEAD Construction Projects
$0 Revenues for Filling Services
$0 Revenues for Cannapods
$0 Revenues for Emotek Extractors
$0 Revenues for THC juices
$0 Revenues for Snody C02 Extractors
$0 Revenues for Tabletop Extractors
The list continues on and on, but I don't have time to list them. RFLMAO

Likely:
$0 Revenues for Personal Cultivators/grow rooms
$0 Revenues for Sangreen Greenhouses (MDA was under Scalable)



There is no speculation on the VitaStik Trademark. All overseas partners had their own rights to the trademark. This was proven. Consequently, accusations of zero revs from overseas partners due to Al owning the trademarks were completely phony. He didn't even own the trademark in the US. The USPTO only showed a disputed application. We also show revs from VitaCig sales during the last 9 months at $586,027. That didn't all come from online domestic sales. Whether Paul gave Al rights to the VitaStik trademark or not is totally irrelevant. No one has yet shown that Al's VitaStiks have made diddly or offered any serious competition to VitaCig's market share.