InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 434
Posts 57599
Boards Moderated 5
Alias Born 01/09/2007

Re: DZ25 post# 298923

Tuesday, 04/11/2017 11:34:22 AM

Tuesday, April 11, 2017 11:34:22 AM

Post# of 312016
no ... for the very *simple* reason that the info is easily sourced from this very venue
and former director's documentation is specific to certain aromatics
and those *efforts* which pertains to a time line of b4 P2O was wrested back
in mid August 2013

overlapping/culminating .. go figure

and note the use of the word *co-equal*


and we all got to read numerous x over that P2O wouldn't file

what is silly imo is ignoring a disruptive tech in an emerging sector
with an enviable SS that NR worked their cycle/s of money since first
coming public in 2009 ..

P2O SURVIVED (now waiting on their ability to THRIVE) .. ;) for 4 co-equal reasons

founder's tech
former director's documentation
current ceo's millions' infused
actual P2O investors many of whom have never sold one share (2008/2009/2010)




btw the 950 in volume so far today re: PTOI went to a long's GTC (043)

PTOI Volume 950
Volume (10 day Average) 32,185
Volume (90 day Average) 45,267


the future .. ;) .. the past .. ;) .. full circle not full cycle .. :)

4kids




10/5/07 -- there are no coincidences here ...
oh and like many other longs .. not selling at this level --