InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 474
Posts 40488
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 02/18/2007

Re: rstar post# 1591

Tuesday, 04/04/2017 1:54:56 PM

Tuesday, April 04, 2017 1:54:56 PM

Post# of 6774
Then the float information might be wrong IMO. Wouldn't be the first time that float information wasn't up to date. Do you guys even realize what kind of risk it would mean for someone to short millions of shares at these levels down here fully knowing that with any good news this could triple with such a float without having any chance to even slightly cover 20% of his shares? Do you guys realize how much selling we have seen lately from CDEL? You would need to be the biggest idiot out there to do this UNLESS you either have shares to cover (against the box) or you KNOW that this one will go down the tubes as a company. There is no other possibility IMO.

I know people who are down in a stock immediately come up with this "short theory" because it kinda gives somebody a good feeling that nobody else is really selling shares because if that is a real seller people would obviously question themselves as to why somebody would sell all these shares here. Now with a shorting theory they feel good. No disrespect but that's just how it is.

Again, if that is a short down here through CDEL, then he knows something or shorts against the box IMO. Heck that might be a note holder who knows they will do a toxic deal or who already has shares and can't sell them before they are current, these are all possibilities, but he is certainly not a net short. That's crazy.

We can just agree to disagree here but that's my opinion. Now if somebody shorted this one at 10 cents after the rally then yes I would agree. Certainly not at 025 with hundreds of thousands of shares every week.